Surgical treatment of anorectal injuries.

نویسندگان

  • Nihat Kaymakcioglu
  • Tahir M Ozer
  • Gokhan Yagci
  • Abdurrahman Simsek
  • Oner Mentes
  • Ali Harlak
  • Nazif Zeybek
  • Turgut Tufan
چکیده

W retrospectively studied 40 patients who were admitted to our department with anorectal trauma during 1996-2004. There were 36 male and 4 female patients with a mean age of 24 + 5.35 (range 20-36 years). We analyzed the injury severity score (ISS) and abbreviated injury scale (AIS) recorded for each patient at the time of admission. The mean ISS was 13.2 + 7.1 (range 4-38). Mean age was 24 + 5.35 years (range 20-36). Five patients (12.5%) suffered blunt abdominal trauma, 2 (5%) had stab injury, 8 (20%) were injured with low-velocity bullets, 14 (35%) were injured with high-velocity bullets, 10 (25%) had shrapnel injury and one (2.5%) suffered from a shotgun injury. Twenty-five patients (62.5%) had hemorrhagic rectal discharge. In the operating room, each patient underwent rigid rectosigmoidoscopy under general anesthesia. Isolated rectal injury was detected in 5 patients (12.5%). The associated organ injuries are shown in Table 1. Four out of 11 intraperitoneal rectal injuries were repaired primarily while resection approach was applied to the remaining 7. Prophylactic ostomy was not carried out in 3 out of 4 primarily repaired patients. Two of these 4 cases were stab injuries while the remaining 2 were pistol injuries. One patient for whom an ostomy was applied, had a pistol injury leading to collateral ileum and bladder trauma. In 5 cases where resection was applied, intestinal passage was maintained by end colostomy and Hartman procedure. Of these 5, 2 patients had colorectal anastomosis. In these patients, proximally located prophylactic ostomy aimed to protect the colorectal anastomosis. There were 10 combined intra and extra-peritoneal injuries. These injuries were located between the transition region of intra-peritoneal and extra-peritoneal rectum. Eight of these injuries were treated with resection, 2 were primarily repaired. Primarily repaired injuries were caused by either a pistol injury or a blunt trauma. Only one of the 2 primarily repaired patients had prophylactic ostomy. Nine of 19 extra-peritoneal injuries involved the anal canal and rectal sphincter. Four of 19 extra-peritoneal injuries were treated by primary suturation; 2 of which were caused by blunt trauma while others were injuries involving low-velocity gunshot incidents. Sphincter injuries were operated with an overlap type, and rectal injury sites were sutured through whole layer. Diverting ostomy was applied to 2 of the primarily repaired patients with an overlap sphincter repairs. Fifteen patient injuries involved the anal canal and perineum, or the site of injury was classified as “difficult injury region to reach,” for which we did not use any repair or resection, but a diverting ostomy with debridement and local washout was preferred. Two of the patients with anal canal and sphincter injuries were treated with primary closure, while 5 patients were treated with local wound care and dressing only. In these 5, the integrity of the anal canal and rectum was maintained although the full function was not. However, patients were nearly satisfied with the continence obtained following the surgery. We have performed primary rectal repair operations in 10 patients. Six of them, for whom we preferred not to use a protective colostomy, had a rectal AIS between 2-3, and their ISS ranged between 4-17 with an average ISS of 7.5 + 3.5. We performed a diverting ostomy in 4 patients whose ISS was over 17 and they had other accompanying injuries. Distal rectal irrigation was carried out for all patients with rectal injury in order to provide mechanical cleaning. Pre-sacral drainage was carried out for each patient with an injury located to the combined intra and extra peritoneal site or below the pelvic peritoneum. Eight out of 29 pre-sacral drainage procedures were performed transabdominally while a perineal incision between coccyx and anus was required for 21 patients. To secure safety of colorectal or coloanal anastomoses, and primary repairs, loop ileostomy was performed when needed. In patients with additional Table 1 Associated organ injuries.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Emergency treatment of violent trauma: clinical cases and surgical treatment of penetrating thoracoabdominal, perineal and anorectal trauma.

AIM The authors analyse clinical cases of penetrating thoracic, abdominal, perineal and anorectal injury and describe the traumatic event and type of lesion, the principles of surgical treatment, the complication rate and follow up. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the last 24 months, we analyzed 10 consecutive cases of penetrating thoracic and abdominal wounds [stab wound (n=7), with evisceration (n...

متن کامل

Etiology of Anorectal Abscess

Summary Abscess formation in the anorectal region is a relatively common occurrence and contributes to a fair number of emergency surgical operations. In this paper the etiology of anorectal abscess is reviewed and an interesting case is presented. In about 20% of cases there many be obvious local cause such as infected fissure, thrombosed pile, trauma following local injection therapy, etc. I...

متن کامل

Laparoscopic Sphincter Saving Surgery for Node Positive Anorectal Melanoma

Anorectal melanomas (ARM) are rare malignancies accounting for 0.4-0.6% of all melanoma cases and 1% of anorectal malignant tumors [1,2]. Surgery remains the gold standard treatment since melanoma are resistant to chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy. Conventionally two forms of surgical treatment are applicable for ARM–Abdominoperineal resection (APER) and wide local excision (WLE) [3]. Though...

متن کامل

Multidetector CT imaging of post-robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy complications

BACKGROUND Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is currently accepted as the preferred minimally invasive surgical treatment for localised prostate cancer, with optimal oncologic and functional results. Despite growing surgical experience, reduced postoperative morbidity and hospital stays, RALRP-related complications may occur, which are severe in 5-7 % of patients and som...

متن کامل

Combined rectovesicular injuries from low velocity penetrating trauma in an adult.

The most common concomitant site of injury following a penetrating anorectal injury is the genitourinary tract. In anorectal penetrating injuries, other organ injuries must be thoroughly evaluated. In the presence of concomitant rectal and posterior bladder injury, consideration should be given to omental interposition between the surgically repaired organs to prevent fistula formation. Fecal d...

متن کامل

A COMPARATIVE ST UDY OF THERAPEUTIC RESULTS OF RIGH T AND LEFT COLONIC INJURIES SUSTAINED BY IRANIAN SOLDIERS IN THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR

The treatment strategy of colonic injuries is a debatable and highly controversial subject worldwide in various medical centers. The method of treatment of left and .. right colonic injuries, diversity or similarity in their management and particularly differences between the treatment of war-associated injury from other types of colonic damage are among the unsettled issues. The present s...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Saudi medical journal

دوره 27 2  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006